A Threshold GARCH Model for Chilean Economic Uncertainty
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, an autoregressive moving average (ARMA) model with threshold generalized autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity (TGARCH) innovations is considered to model Chilean economic uncertainty time series. Uncertainty is measured through the Business Confidence Index (BCI) and Consumer Perception Index (CPI). The BCI time series provide useful information about industry; commerce; the finance, mining, construction, and agricultural sectors; and the global economic situation and the general business situation. As a counterpart, the CPI time series measure the perception of consumers regarding the state of the Chilean economy, evaluating their economic situation and expectations. The ARMA-TGARCH model is compared with the classical seasonal ARIMA and threshold AR ones. The results show that the ARMA-TGARCH model explains the regime changes in economic uncertainty better than the others, given that negative shocks are associated with statistically significant and quantitatively larger levels of volatility produced by the COVID-19 pandemic. In addition, a diagnostic analysis and prediction performance illustrates the suitability of the proposed model. Using a cross-validation analysis for the forecasting performance, a proposed heteroscedastic model may effectively help improve the forecasting accuracy for observations related to pessimism periods like the social uprising and the COVID-19 crisis which produced volatility in the Chilean uncertainty indexes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".