MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4313250817 · doi:10.1177/09544070221144159

Robust path following control of 4WID autonomous vehicle with driving condition adaptive mechanism

2022· article· en· W4313250817 on OpenAlexaff
Yixiao Liang, Yinong Li, Amir Khajepour, Ling Zheng

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part D Journal of Automobile Engineering · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVehicle Dynamics and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCarSimControl theory (sociology)Controller (irrigation)YawVehicle dynamicsLinear matrix inequalityMoment (physics)EngineeringPath (computing)Computer scienceControl (management)Automotive engineeringMathematicsMathematical optimization

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposes a novel integrated path following control scheme for a 4-Wheel Independent Drive (4WID) autonomous vehicle that can adaptively change its mechanism according to the driving conditions. The proposed integrated system handles the lateral steering controller, longitudinal speed, and yaw moment controls considering tire force capacity of each corner. For the lateral controller, the cornering stiffness uncertainties and the transient performance are considered and combined into an H∞ robust controller based on linear matrix inequality (LMI) theory. A super-twisting sliding mode controller (STSMC) based longitudinal controller is designed to deal with disturbances and suppress chattering. When encountering extreme conditions, the active yaw moment controller with hierarchical structure is adaptively activated to prevent large deviation from the reference path and maintain the stability of vehicle. For the tire force allocation, an optimization algorithm is proposed, which has flexible equality constraints to coordinate the longitudinal and lateral motions according to the driving conditions. Simulations based on Carsim-Simulink co-simulation platform show that the proposed method is effective and has excellent performance in both normal and extreme driving conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.172
Threshold uncertainty score0.913

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.164
Teacher spread0.159 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part D Journal of Automobile EngineeringSame topicVehicle Dynamics and Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207