MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4313256458 · doi:10.46451/ijclt.20230102

加拿大汉语教育状况及发展

2022· article· zh· W4313256458 on OpenAlexaffabout
Wei Cai, R. Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Chinese Language Teaching · 2022
Typearticle
Languagezh
FieldComputer Science
TopicHigher Education and Teaching Methods
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

加拿大的汉语学习者展现出来的某些规律及汉语教学的一些特点,跟其他环境下的汉语学 习者和汉语教学存在着很多共性。但同时, 加拿大的汉语学习与教学也具有自己的特色。近年来, 国别化研究越来越为学界所重视,这是因为每个国家的语言政策、文化背景、政府与机构的支 持等因素不同,这些因素都会对汉语教学产生影响。 加拿大的多元文化和社会体制尽人皆知。依据加拿大多元法案, "加拿大宪法认可加拿大 公民保留和提升多元文化继承的重要性";多元文化政策"认可并提升理解多元文化反映加拿大 社会的文化和种族多样性及认可加拿大社会所有成员对保持、提升和分享其文化传承的自由" (Government of Canada, 1985, 3(1)(a))。这种多元文化的理念和政策使人们对继承语的学习持有更 摘要

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.043
Threshold uncertainty score0.297

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0060.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.371
Teacher spread0.356 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Chinese Language TeachingSame topicHigher Education and Teaching MethodsFrench-language works237,207