First Records of White River Crayfish (Procambarus acutus) in Canada on Pelee Island, Ontario, with notes on other crayfish species present and their habitats
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Freshwater crayfish rank among the most imperilled groups and play several critical roles in freshwater ecosystems, yet survey efforts remain limited throughout much of Canada and North America. Inadequate survey and monitoring efforts render our ecosystems vulnerable to the introduction and spread of harmful invasive species which can be difficult or impossible to control following establishment. During surveys targeting salamander larvae across Pelee Island, Ontario we incidentally captured crayfish and identified them to species. Three species were detected including two native species known only from collections in the 1960s (Creaserinus fodiens, Faxonius immunis) as well as the non-native White River Crayfish (Procambarus acutus) which has not been documented previously in Canada. Our oldest record of P. acutus is from 2015, and the species currently appears to be widespread and well established on Pelee Island and has also recently been recorded in Six Mile Lake on the Canadian Shield. We provide preliminary data on the aquatic habitats where each species was found on Pelee Island and strongly encourage additional monitoring efforts combined with targeted education efforts to prevent the spread of P. acutus to the Ontario mainland.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".