Bibliographic record
Abstract
The paper focuses on the attempt made in the last decades of the Soviet government to revive the traditional jewelry art in Tajikistan. The state of traditional jewelry art in the republic during the years of Soviet power and, in particular, at the end of the third quarter of the 20th century, is assessed. The creative path of the artists who have become folk craftsmen is described as well as the philosophical concept of the ‘Three weddings’ created by them. It is, on the one hand, an experience of comprehending their artistic creativity, explaining the symbolism of a work of jewelry art, and, on the other hand, the application of this experience to various stages of a person’s life path. The connection between different groups of Tajik jewelry and age gradations that existed in the traditional Tajik society is explained. An interpretation of some symbols that are figurative, color, and numerological, which are used in the works of traditional jewelry art, is given. An essay written in the mid-1990s is incorporated in the paper, being the first exposition of the concept of the ‘Three Weddings’. It gives a description of different groups of traditional Tajik women’s jewelry — amulets, bracelets, necklaces, etc., described in parallel in their traditional and modern forms. It compares how traditional and modern jewelry created within the same jewelry tradition can be perceived.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".