ANALISIS AKUNTABILITAS DAN TRANSPARANSI PENGELOLAAN KEUANGAN DANA DESA DI DESA SEMANGKO KECAMATAN MARANGKAYU KABUPATEN KUTAI KARTANEGARA TAHUN 2019
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This research aims to determine whether the financial management in Semangko Village, Marangkayu District, Kutai Kartanegara Regency has fulfilled the principles of Accountability and Transparency in Village Financial Management. This research uses qualitative research methods with data reduction techniques, data presentation, data conclusion, verification and final conclusions. The data collection techniques used in this field research are interview, observation and document study. The results of data analysis from the results of interviews, observations and document studies on the level of accountability and transparency in the financial management of village funds in Semangko Village, show that the application of Accountability and Transparency in Village Financial Management in Semangko Village, Marangkayu District, Kutai Kartanegara Regency in planning, implementation, administration and the responsibility is good enough
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it