Bibliographic record
Abstract
As the oil and gas drilling industry moves into more technically challenging environments [e.g., drilling ultradeep onshore/offshore wells under extremely high temperature (above 300°F) and pressure (mud specific gravity above 2.0)], companies increasingly come under pressure to stretch technology and improve drilling performance while continuously striving to reduce costs and meet the requirements of stricter environmental regulations. Significant reserves additions may be realized if the risks associated with drilling in such harsh conditions (e.g., pressure control, wellbore instability, lost-circulation, sour gas) can be managed effectively. Design and development of a new generation of drilling fluids able to fulfill all of the attributed functions (e.g., stabilize the wellbore, control formation pressure, transport the drilled cuttings, minimize the fluid loss, and not reduce formation productivity) under such extreme pressure and temperature conditions is one of the key requirements for unlocking these resources. Drilling fluids used under ultrahigh pressures and temperatures need to be thermally stable and able to retain their rheological properties. Traditionally, nonaqueous drilling fluids (NADFs) have been used under these extreme conditions. NADFs, however, have significantly high operational costs with an associated health, safety, and environmental risk. As a result, there has been an increasing demand from operators to use aqueous drilling fluids [water-based muds (WBMs)], which are known to be environmentally benign and relatively less expensive. The use of WBMs under extreme temperatures and pressures, however, faces several challenges, including the breakdown of polymers and other additives used as fluid-loss preventers and rheological stabilizers. Therefore, recent research has focused on design and development of WBM systems meeting the following specifications: - Use of sodium chloride (for barite-laden formulation) and sodium bromide (for barite-free formulation) as base brines to reduce the total solids content for optimal fluid properties and to maximize the quality of wireline logs - Ensure inhibition of reactive shale formations to maintain wellbore stability while drilling intermediate sections - Provide optimal and stable rheological properties for excellent hole cleaning and drilling performance The newly developed ultrahigh-temperature water-based systems used custom-made branched synthetic polymers that exhibit superior rheological properties and fluid-loss control as well as long-term stability above 400°F. These branched synthetic polymers are compatible with most oilfield brines and maintain excellent low-end rheology. Other formulations proposed the use of β-cyclodextrin polymer microspheres (β-CPMs) as an environmentally friendly ultrahigh-temperature filtration reducer. When the temperature rose above 160°C, a hydrothermal reaction occurred for β-CPMs, and, as a result, numerous micro- and nanosized carbon spheres formed, which bridged across micro- and nanopores within the filter cake and reduced the filter cake permeability effectively. Bentonite-hydrothermal carbon nanocomposites also are proposed as nonpolymer additives to solve the ultrahigh-temperature/-pressure challenge in water-based drilling fluid. The nanocomposites are synthesized by a simple hydrothermal reaction in which biomass starch and sodium bentonite are used as the precursor and template, respectively. Such formulations have shown favorable rheology and filtration properties after hot rolling at temperatures as high as 460°F. This section presents selected papers showing examples of design, development, and field applications of the new generation of WBM fluid technologies. Recommended additional reading at OnePetro: www.onepetro.org SPE 206444 - Successful Application of a New Generation of Clay-Inhibitor Polymers While Drilling a Deep Exploration Well in the Astrakhan Region by Petr Leonidovich Ryabtsev, Akros, et al. SPE 205539 - Improvement of Rheological and Filtration Properties of Water-Based Drilling Fluids Using Bentonite-Hydrothermal Carbon Nanocomposites Under Ultrahigh-Temperature and High-Pressure Conditions by Hanyi Zhong, China University of Petroleum East China, et al. SPE 209805 - The Utilization of Self-Crosslinkable Nanoparticles as a High-Temperature Plugging Agent in Water-Based Drilling Fluid by Ming Lei, University of Alberta, et al.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".