MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4313313918 · doi:10.36227/techrxiv.21791837

Spectral-Temporal Saliency Masks and Modulation Tensorgrams for Generalizable COVID-19 Detection

2022· preprint· en· W4313313918 on OpenAlexafffund
Tiago H. Falk

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCOVID-19 diagnosis using AI
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche ScientifiqueUniversité du Québec à Montréal
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsInterpretabilityComputer scienceGeneralizability theoryRobustness (evolution)Benchmark (surveying)Masking (illustration)Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Convolutional neural networkArtificial intelligenceMachine learningOverfittingDeep learningGeneralizationPopularityRepresentation (politics)Data miningPattern recognition (psychology)Artificial neural networkMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Speech COVID-19 detection systems have gained popularity as they represent an easy-to-use and low-cost solution that is well suited for at-home long-term monitoring of patients with persistent symptoms. Recently, however, the limited generalization capability of existing deep neural network based systems to unseen datasets has been raised as a serious concern, as has their limited interpretability. In this paper, we propose two innovations to help overcome these issues. First, we propose the use of a 3-dimensional modulation frequency tensor (called modulation tensorgram representation, MTR) as input to a convolutional recurrent neural network for COVID-19 detection. The representation is known to provide robustness against different environmental factors seen across datasets. Next, we propose the use of spectro-temporal saliency masking to aggregate regions of the MTR related to COVID-19, thus helping further improve the generalizability and interpretability of the model. Experiments are conducted on three public datasets and results show the proposed solution consistently outperforming two benchmark systems in within-, across-, and unseen-dataset tests. The proposed method relies on a similar number of parameters to the benchmark, thus a promising solution for at-home monitoring of COVID-19 infection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.359
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCOVID-19 diagnosis using AIFrench-language works237,207