A Benders decomposition framework for the optimization of disjunctive superstructures with ordered discrete decisions
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract This study introduces the logic‐based discrete‐Benders decomposition (LD‐BD) for Generalized Disjunctive Programming (GDP) superstructure problems with ordered Boolean variables. The key idea is to obtain Benders cuts that use neighborhood information of a reformulated version of Boolean variables. These Benders cuts are iteratively refined, which guarantees convergence to a local optimum. A mathematical case study, the optimization of a network with Continuous Stirred‐Tank Reactors (CSTRs) in series, and a large‐scale problem involving the design of a distillation column are considered to demonstrate the features of LD‐BD. The results from these case studies have shown that the LD‐BD method exhibited good performance by finding attractive locally optimal solutions relative to existing logic‐based solvers for GDP problems. Based on these tests, the LD‐BD method is a promising strategy to solve optimal synthesis problems with ordered discrete decisions emerging in chemical engineering applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it