MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4313327806 · doi:10.3390/math11010168

Control of a Hydraulic Generator Regulating System Using Chebyshev-Neural-Network-Based Non-Singular Fast Terminal Sliding Mode Method

2022· article· en· W4313327806 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematics · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic and Pneumatic Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaUniversity of Alberta
FundersKing Abdulaziz University
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Terminal sliding modeSliding mode controlRobustness (evolution)Robust controlNonlinear systemLyapunov functionArtificial neural networkLyapunov stabilityComputer scienceFeedback linearizationControl systemControl engineeringMathematicsEngineeringControl (management)Physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A hydraulic generator regulating system with electrical, mechanical, and hydraulic constitution is a complex nonlinear system, which is analyzed in this research. In the present study, the dynamical behavior of this system is investigated. Afterward, the input/output feedback linearization theory is exerted to derive the controllable model of the system. Then, the chaotic behavior of the system is controlled using a robust controller that uses a Chebyshev neural network as a disturbance observer in combination with a non-singular robust terminal sliding mode control method. Moreover, the convergence of the system response to the desired output in the presence of uncertainty and unexpected disturbances is demonstrated through the Lyapunov stability theorem. Finally, the effectiveness and appropriate performance of the proposed control scheme in terms of robustness against uncertainty and unexpected disturbances are demonstrated through numerical simulations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.585
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it