Caracterizando a violência obstétrica
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Caracterizar a VO por meio do documentário “O renascimento do parto”. Pesquisa exploratória de abordagem qualitativa a partir dos relatos presentes na trilogia “O Renascimento do Parto”. Violência verbal, desrespeito ao protagonismo feminino e manipulação foram às situações frequentes de violência obstétrica nos relatos, negligenciando o direito da mulher e transformando o parto em um procedimento motorizado e desrespeitoso tanto para a parturiente quanto para o bebê, ocasionando consequências diversas e, muitas vezes irreversíveis, tais como transtornos comportamentais, confusões, traumas, inseguranças, transformando um evento potencialmente inesquecível, biológico e natural em algo aterrorizante, traumático e desumano. O profissional de enfermagem, junto a sua equipe precisa proporcionar um ambiente de total acolhida, desde o momento do pré-natal à hora do parto e acompanhamento puerperal. O olhar humano e visão holística devem predominar e serem cultivados pelos mesmos, respeitando e priorizando as emoções e sentimentos da mulher.
 Descritores: Violência, Violência Obstétrica, Parto Humanizado, Cuidados de Enfermagem.
 
 Characterizing obstetric violence
 Abstract: To characterize OV through the documentary “The rebirth of childbirth”. Exploratory research with a qualitative approach based on the reports present in the trilogy “The Renaissance of Childbirth”. Verbal violence, disrespect for female protagonism and manipulation were the frequent situations of obstetric violence in the reports, neglecting women's rights and transforming childbirth into a procedure motorized and disrespectful for both the mother and the baby, causing diverse and often irreversible consequences, such as behavioral disorders, confusions, traumas, insecurities, transforming a potentially unforgettable, biological and natural event into something terrifying, traumatic and inhumane. Nursing professionals, along with their team, need to provide an environment of total welcome, from the moment of prenatal care to the time of delivery and postpartum follow-up. The human look and holistic vision should predominate and be cultivated by them, respecting and prioritizing women's emotions and feelings.
 Descriptors: Violence, Obstetric Violence, Humanizing Delivery, Nursing Care.
 
 Caracterización de la violencia obstétrica
 Resumen: Caracterizar a VO a través del documental “El renacimiento del parto”. Investigación exploratoria con enfoque cualitativo a partir de los relatos presentes en la trilogía “El renacimiento del parto”. La violencia verbal, la falta de respeto al protagonismo femenino y la manipulación fueron las situaciones frecuentes de violencia obstétrica en los relatos, descuidando el derecho de la mujer y transformando el parto en un procedimiento motorizado e irrespetuoso tanto para la madre como para el bebé, provocando distintas consecuencias y, a menudo, irreversibles. , como trastornos de conducta, confusiones, traumas, inseguridades, transformando un evento potencialmente inolvidable, biológico y natural en algo aterrador, traumático e inhumano. Los profesionales de enfermería, junto con su equipo, necesitan brindar un ambiente de total acogida, desde el momento de la atención prenatal hasta el momento del parto y seguimiento posparto. La mirada humana y la visión holística deben predominar y ser cultivadas por ellos, respetando y priorizando las emociones y sentimientos de las mujeres.
 Descriptores: Violencia, Violencia Obstétrica, Nacimiento Humanizado, Atención de Enfermería.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.019 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".