MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4313329841 · doi:10.24832/nw.v16i2.505

BENTUK, KRONOLOGI, DAN ASAL TEMBIKAR KUNO DI DATARAN RENDAH LAMPUNG

2022· article· id· W4313329841 on OpenAlexaff
Rusyanti, Iwan Setiawan, Akbar Adhi Satrio

Bibliographic record

VenueNaditira Widya · 2022
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCultural and Artistic Studies
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPotteryChronologyDeskHumanitiesArchaeologyGeologyGeographyMineralogyArtEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tembikar merupakan artefak arkeologi yang dibuat dari tanah liat bakar yang secara umum berfungsi sebagai peralatan sehari-hari. Tembikar banyak ditemukan di situs-situs arkeologi, termasuk di dataran rendah Lampung. Penelitian desk study tahun 2020-2021 melakukan analisis mengenai rekonstruksi bentuk, kronologi, dan asal tembikar Lampung dengan metode gabungan kuantitatif melalui uji laboratorium X-ray fluorescence, X-ray diffraction, Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry, Petrografi, dan Thermoluminescence. Metode kualitatif pun digunakan untuk rekonstruksi hasil selective sampling dengan menggunakan Rhinoceros software dan didukung pendekatan sejarah. Tujuan penelitian adalah mengetahui kecenderungan varian bentuk, kronologi, dan asal tembikar Lampung secara umum. Penelitian ini menghasilkan bentuk yang direkonstruksi berupa wadah sehari-hari terbanyak berupa mangkuk, cawan, dan jambangan. Cakupan kronologi tembikar adalah sejak abad ke-12 hingga ke-20 Masehi. Adapun asal produksi tembikar diketahui melalui pendekatan geologis dan sejarah, dan diduga di sekitar kawasan Kayu Agung Palembang dan Bakung Udik, Lampung. Pottery is an archaeological artefact made from baked clay, which functions as a daily tool. Pottery has been found in archaeological sites, including Lampung lowlands. The 2020-2021 desk study analyses were carried out to reconstruct the form of pottery and to understand the chronology as well as the origin of the Lampung pottery using a quantitative combined method through laboratory tests of X-ray fluorescence, X-ray diffraction, Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry, Petrography, and Thermoluminescence. Qualitative methods were also used to reconstruct the results of selective sampling using the Rhinoceros software supported by a historical approach. The purpose of this research is to know the favourable varieties of form, chronology, and origin of Lampung pottery in general. This research resulted in reconstructed forms of dominant pottery containers common for daily use such as bowls, cups, and vases. The chronology of pottery covers from the 12th to the 20th century. The origin of pottery production is known through a geological and historical approach and suggested to be manufactured around the Kayu Agung Palembang and Bakung Udik regions, in Lampung.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNaditira WidyaSame topicCultural and Artistic StudiesFrench-language works237,207