BENTUK, KRONOLOGI, DAN ASAL TEMBIKAR KUNO DI DATARAN RENDAH LAMPUNG
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tembikar merupakan artefak arkeologi yang dibuat dari tanah liat bakar yang secara umum berfungsi sebagai peralatan sehari-hari. Tembikar banyak ditemukan di situs-situs arkeologi, termasuk di dataran rendah Lampung. Penelitian desk study tahun 2020-2021 melakukan analisis mengenai rekonstruksi bentuk, kronologi, dan asal tembikar Lampung dengan metode gabungan kuantitatif melalui uji laboratorium X-ray fluorescence, X-ray diffraction, Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry, Petrografi, dan Thermoluminescence. Metode kualitatif pun digunakan untuk rekonstruksi hasil selective sampling dengan menggunakan Rhinoceros software dan didukung pendekatan sejarah. Tujuan penelitian adalah mengetahui kecenderungan varian bentuk, kronologi, dan asal tembikar Lampung secara umum. Penelitian ini menghasilkan bentuk yang direkonstruksi berupa wadah sehari-hari terbanyak berupa mangkuk, cawan, dan jambangan. Cakupan kronologi tembikar adalah sejak abad ke-12 hingga ke-20 Masehi. Adapun asal produksi tembikar diketahui melalui pendekatan geologis dan sejarah, dan diduga di sekitar kawasan Kayu Agung Palembang dan Bakung Udik, Lampung. Pottery is an archaeological artefact made from baked clay, which functions as a daily tool. Pottery has been found in archaeological sites, including Lampung lowlands. The 2020-2021 desk study analyses were carried out to reconstruct the form of pottery and to understand the chronology as well as the origin of the Lampung pottery using a quantitative combined method through laboratory tests of X-ray fluorescence, X-ray diffraction, Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry, Petrography, and Thermoluminescence. Qualitative methods were also used to reconstruct the results of selective sampling using the Rhinoceros software supported by a historical approach. The purpose of this research is to know the favourable varieties of form, chronology, and origin of Lampung pottery in general. This research resulted in reconstructed forms of dominant pottery containers common for daily use such as bowls, cups, and vases. The chronology of pottery covers from the 12th to the 20th century. The origin of pottery production is known through a geological and historical approach and suggested to be manufactured around the Kayu Agung Palembang and Bakung Udik regions, in Lampung.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".