MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

ERK1/2 and NFκB are key signaling pathways in the regulation of CXCL8 expression and secretion by intestinal epithelial cells in response to P2Y6 receptor activation (39.43)

2009· article· en· W4313344665 on OpenAlexaff
Djordje Grbic, Fernand‐Pierre Gendron

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Immunology · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCytokine Signaling Pathways and Interactions
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSignal transductionCell biologyInterleukin 8LuciferaseMAPK/ERK pathwaySecretionChemokineExtracellularReceptorNF-κBBiologyPhosphorylationBlotChemistryMolecular biologyCell cultureCytokineTransfectionBiochemistryImmunologyGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Extracellular nucleotides are recognized as inflammatory-active molecules. We have investigated the role of extracellular uridine 5’-triphosphate (UDP) and its associated P2Y6 receptor in the secretion of CXCL8 by intestinal epithelial cells. We have also characterized signaling pathways linking UDP to the expression of CXCL8. The effect of the P2Y6 activation by UDP on chemokine expression and release by epithelial cells was determined using combination of western blots, luciferase assays, Q-PCR and ELISA. We have monitored the activation of different signaling molecules by western blots, luciferase assays and EMSA, along with different pharmacological inhibitors. Stimulation of Caco-2 cells with UDP lead to PKCδ and PKCζ, as well as ERK 1/2 and NFκB-p65 phosphorylation. Mutations of the NFκB binding site in the minimal promoter of the human CXCL8 completely abolished the luciferase activity stimulated with UDP. EMSA assays showed the importance of NFκB binding site for the initiation of transcription of CXCL8 by P2Y6. In this study, we showed the most detailed signaling pathway known so far for P2Y6 receptor its implication in UDP stimulate CXCL8 expression and release by intestinal epithelial cells.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.091
Threshold uncertainty score0.239

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of ImmunologySame topicCytokine Signaling Pathways and InteractionsFrench-language works237,207