T cell correlates of solid protective immunity following immunization of macaques with a live-attenuated trachoma vaccine (P4403)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Trachoma, caused by Chlamydia trachomatis, is the world’s leading cause of preventable blindness for which a vaccine is needed. We previously described a live-attenuated trachoma vaccine (LATV) in non-human primates (Kari L. 2011 JEM 208: 2217-23). Vaccinated macaques were either solidly or partially protected following challenge with virulent trachoma organisms. Our current goal was to characterize immune responses that correlated with solid protective immunity. Here, we preformed intramuscular boosting of LATV vaccinated macaques and studied the T cell recall response in PBMC by flow cytometry. Both solidly and partially protected macaques exhibited a strong PBMC CD8+ T recall response following intramuscular immunization. Notably, however; only CD8+ T cells from solidly protected macaques strongly proliferated in response to chlamydial soluble antigen (SA) prepared from chlamydial infected cells. The SA contained proteins known to be secreted by chlamydiae into the host cytosol making them logical antigenic targets of cytotoxic CD8+ T cells. The SA expanded CD8+ T cells expressed IFN-γ, granzyme B, and α4β7 integrin implicating them as effectors important to the development of solid protective immunity at the ocular mucosae. Identifying the effector function and antigens recognized by these CD8+ T cells will be the focus of future studies as this information will provide insights into the design of more conventional immunotherapeutic approaches for trachoma control.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".