Pengaruh Pendapatan Asli Daerah, Dana Bagi Hasil, Dana Alokasi Umum dan Dana Alokasi Khusus terhadap Belanja Daerah dan Pertumbuhan Ekonomi (Studi Kasus pada Kabupaten/Kota di Provinsi Kalimantan Selatan Tahun 2010-2019)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study was conducted to analyze the effect of PAD, DBH, DAU, DAK on Regional Expenditures and Economic Growth. This research was conducted in all regencies/cities in South Kalimantan Province within a period of 10 years, namely from 2010-2019. The data used is secondary data obtained from the Central Statistics Agency (BPS) and the website of the General Directorate of Balance (www.djpk.kemenkeu.go.id). The type of data studied is panel data with an analytical method that is path analysis. The results showed that PAD, DBH, DAU, and DAK had a significant effect on Regional Expenditures. PAD and Regional Expenditures have a significant effect on Economic Growth. Meanwhile, DBH, DAU, and DAK do not have a significant effect on Economic Growth. Regional Expenditures can be a mediator between PAD, DBH, DAU, and DAK on Economic Growth.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it