Phase Stability and Kinetics of Topotactic Dual Ca<sup>2+</sup>–Na<sup>+</sup> Ion Electrochemistry in NaSICON NaV<sub>2</sub>(PO<sub>4</sub>)<sub>3</sub>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recent reports of reversible calcium plating and stripping have rekindled interest in the development of Ca-ion batteries (CIBs) as next-generation energy storage devices. This technology has the potential to overcome the limitations of conventional Li-ion batteries, but CIBs are plagued by a paucity of suitable cathode materials. To date, NaSICON-structured NaV 2 (PO 4 ) 3 has been demonstrated as a successful cathode candidate, exhibiting reversible (de)intercalation of 0.6 mol Ca 2+ along with stable cycling performance. However, a complex multiphase mixture forms on discharge so the Ca-ion charge storage mechanism in the NaSICON framework is poorly understood. In this work, we report on an investigation of the structure and/or Na + /Ca 2+ environment(s) of a variety of chemically prepared NaSICON Ca x Na y V 2 (PO 4 ) 3 phases which were characterized using synchrotron XRD, SEM-EDS, 23 Na NMR, and TEM. Highly calciated CaV 2 (PO 4 ) 3, Ca 1.5 V 2 (PO 4 ) 3, and CaNaV 2 (PO 4 ) 3 phases can be prepared at high temperature, but─unlike Ca 0.6 NaV 2 (PO 4 ) 3 ─these materials are electrochemically inactive. To better understand the fundamental factors impacting successful Ca 2+ electrochemistry in this system, DFT was employed to examine the Ca x Na y V 2 (PO 4 ) 3 phase diagram and Ca 2+ diffusion mechanism. Theoretical insights show that phase separation into Na-rich and Ca-rich phases is a reason for the capacity limitation and demonstrate that Na + ions in the host materials assist the migration of neighboring Ca 2+ ions, enabling reversible electrochemistry in Ca x Na y V 2 (PO 4 ) 3 . This investigation of fundamental principles affecting reversible Ca 2+ (de)intercalation in Ca x Na y V 2 (PO 4 ) 3 allows for the development of design principles to enable the discovery of a variety of successful cathodes for CIBs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".