MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Deep characterization of <i>in vitro</i> chronically stimulated T cells via single-cell multiomic analysis

2020· article· en· W4313369002 on OpenAlexaff
Mirko Corselli, Suraj Saksena, Margaret Nakamoto, Woodrow E. Lomas, Ian Taylor, Pratip K. Chattopadhyay

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Immunology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCAR-T cell therapy research
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCD28Downregulation and upregulationEffectorCellTranscriptomeBiologyCell biologyIn vitroT cellFlow cytometryStimulationMolecular biologyPhenotypeGeneGene expressionImmunologyGeneticsImmune systemNeuroscience

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract To generate enough cells for viable adoptive cell therapy, cells must be robustly stimulated, which raises the risk of inducing T-cell exhaustion and reducing therapeutic efficacy. To comprehensively characterize in vitro chronically expanded human T cells, we performed single-cell multiomic analysis using BD® AbSeq and BD Rhapsody™ Single-Cell Analysis system for simultaneous measurement of the expression of 38 proteins and 399 genes. Comprehensive immunophenotypic and transcriptomic analysis at day 0 enabled a refined characterization of T-cell maturational states. T-cell activation induced by anti-CD3/CD28 beads and recombinant human IL-2 led to downregulation of naïve-associated markers and upregulation of effector molecules, proliferation regulators, co-inhibitory and co-stimulatory receptors. Our deep kinetic analysis further revealed clusters of proteins and genes identifying unique states of activation defined by markers temporarily expressed upon 3 days of stimulation, markers constitutively expressed throughout chronic activation, and markers uniquely up-regulated upon 14 days of stimulation. These data indicate heterogeneity and plasticity of chronically stimulated T cells in response to different kinetics of activation. We demonstrate the power of a single-cell multiomic approach to comprehensively characterize T cells and to precisely monitor changes in differentiation, activation and exhaustion signatures in response to different activation protocols. For Research Use Only. Not for use in diagnostic or therapeutic procedures. BD, the BD Logo, and Rhapsody are trademarks of Becton, Dickinson and Company or its affiliates. © 2019 BD. All rights reserved.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of ImmunologySame topicCAR-T cell therapy researchFrench-language works237,207