MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4313377543 · doi:10.1016/j.gecco.2022.e02355

Shifts in diel activity of Rocky Mountain mammal communities in response to anthropogenic disturbance and sympatric invasive white-tailed deer

2022· article· en· W4313377543 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Persia B. Khan, Laura Eliuk, Sandra Frey, Christopher Bone, Jason T. Fisher

Bibliographic record

VenueGlobal Ecology and Conservation · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWildlife Ecology and Conservation
Canadian institutionsGovernment of British ColumbiaUniversity of Victoria
FundersInnotech AlbertaAlberta InnovatesMitacsNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaGovernment of AlbertaYellowstone to Yukon Conservation InitiativeAlberta Environment and Parks
KeywordsSympatric speciationEcologyDisturbance (geology)UngulateOdocoileusPredationBiologyMammalGeographyHabitat

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Coexistence mechanisms such as temporal niche partitioning among sympatric wildlife species may be impacted by continued human disturbance and invasive species. White-tailed deer expansion in North America, a product of landscape and climate change, may alter other species’ diel activity and have implications for conservation of native species. We asked: 1) To what degree does invasive white-tailed deer temporal activity overlap with other ungulate species (mule deer and moose) in landscapes with high human disturbance, versus landscapes with low human disturbance? 2) To what degree does invasive white-tailed deer and predator activity (wolves, grizzly bears, and coyotes) overlap in landscapes with high human disturbance versus landscapes with low human disturbance? Using detection data from infrared remote cameras, we compared a high-disturbance (2019–2020) and a low-disturbance (2009–2010) landscape in the Canadian Rocky Mountains. We used activity pattern analysis to quantify temporal overlap between sympatric mammal species and white-tailed deer. We found that contrary to our hypotheses, sympatric ungulate species maintained activity and temporal overlap with white-tailed deer in both landscapes. Predators did not match the temporal activity of white-tailed deer in the high-disturbance landscape as closely as in the low-disturbance landscape. We conjecture ungulates may be prioritizing periods of optimal foraging or reducing predation risk rather than temporal niche partitioning from invasive-white-tailed deer. Predator species may be more sensitive to anthropogenic disturbance than ungulates and adjust their temporal activity in high-disturbance landscapes. Native ungulates’ lack of diel activity adaptation to white-tailed deer invasions is an important piece of the behavioural puzzle about how western Nearctic systems change with anthropogenic disturbance and human-mediated range shifts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.047
Threshold uncertainty score0.094

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2022
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGlobal Ecology and ConservationSame topicWildlife Ecology and ConservationFrench-language works237,207