MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4313380820 · doi:10.35968/jsi.v10i1.1004

Sektor Industri Pariwisata Dengan Media Digital Di Masa Pandemi Covid-19 Luh Suryatni

2014· article· id· W4313380820 on OpenAlexaff
Luh Suryatni

Bibliographic record

VenueJURNAL SISTEM INFORMASI UNIVERSITAS SURYADARMA · 2014
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSMEs Development and Digital Marketing
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTourismGovernment (linguistics)Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)BusinessPandemicTheme parkEconomyMarketingPolitical scienceEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Since the pandemic caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus (COVID-19) appeared in the end of 2019 it significantly affected the tourism industry. Government in Indonesia have adopted emergency measures and restrictions that have affected the mobility of everyone. From museum to amusement park, they were empty, even closed since people’s movements were stopped, and travel among different territories was strictly controlled. Lockdown and quarantine around the world caused by COVID-19 has harmed people’s livelihoods and the world economy. During this situation government pushing the idea of the advantage of digital era and adopted by tourism industry. The purpose of this paper is to find out and analyzing tourism industry has facing during the pandemic and how it used digital technology in purpose of revive their condition. The data collection method used is a literature study with descriptive analysis techniques. The results are showed that Indonesia tourism industry starting to get better in situation by using digital media and working together with application that provides help for tourist planning the trip and open the new chances of new business.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.099

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0290.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJURNAL SISTEM INFORMASI UNIVERSITAS SURYADARMASame topicSMEs Development and Digital MarketingFrench-language works237,207