MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4313391183 · doi:10.4000/pontourbe.13705

Sem alarmes, sem surpresas – fertilizar, fermentar, reagir e metamorfosear o pensamento de Bruno Latour1

2022· article· pt· W4313391183 on OpenAlex
Marisol Marini

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePonto Urbe · 2022
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSociology and Education in Brazil
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesMaterials scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Teria sido diferente escrever sobre as contribuições de Bruno Latour até há algumas poucas semanas. Os mortos reagem? É certo que suas contribuições e pensamentos podem persistir, podemos fazer os livros e ideias dos mortos falarem outras línguas e responderem novas questões, abrirem novos caminhos inesperados. Mas há um efeito distinto em invocar o pensamento de alguém que perdeu sua autonomia relativa de fala em seus emaranhados comunicativos. Isso traz um senso de responsabilidade distinto...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.155
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0420.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.363
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it