MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4313396741 · doi:10.1177/27526461221144756

What we can learn from remote learning in elementary schools

2022· article· en· W4313396741 on OpenAlexafffund
Rebecca Collins‐Nelsen, Michaela Hill, Sandeep Raha

Bibliographic record

VenueEquity in Education & Society · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicParental Involvement in Education
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of CanadaMcMaster University
KeywordsInequalityPhenomenonPandemicMathematics educationValue (mathematics)Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)PsychologyPedagogyComputer scienceMedicineMathematicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Health regulations stemming from the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in an unprecedented shift towards remote and online learning at the elementary level during the 2020 and 2021 school years. Given the exceptionality of this phenomenon, there is little previous research that explores virtual learning at the elementary level. With this in mind, we surveyed parents of elementary students about their experiences. Significant financial-based barriers notwithstanding, our research introduces novel and unexpected findings about the value of remote learning – most notably to address other forms of social inequality. Ultimately, we advocate for a more inclusive and equitable approach to post-pandemic elementary education.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.125
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.405
Teacher spread0.335 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEquity in Education & SocietySame topicParental Involvement in EducationFrench-language works237,207