MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4313397737 · doi:10.56108/ujte.1190769

Müşriklerin Ulu’l-Azm Peygamberlerden Talepleri

2022· article· tr· W4313397737 on OpenAlexaff
Habip Kalaç

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversal Journal of Theology · 2022
Typearticle
Languagetr
FieldPsychology
TopicFamilies in Therapy and Culture
Canadian institutionsMusée de la Civilisation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyTheology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

İnsanlığın atası aynı zamanda ilk peygamber olmuştur. Hz. Âdem ile başlayan süreç Hz. Muhammed ile son bulmuş olup ilahi emrin insanlara ulaştırılması ve anlam bulması peygamberler vasıtasıyla gerçekleşmiştir. Bununla beraber tebyin ve tebliğ şeklinde iki önemli görevi üstlenen peygamberler, zaman dilimi içerisinde, görevlerini ifa etme noktasında bir takım sıkıntılara maruz kalmışlardır. Bu makalede ulu’l-azm olan peygamberlerin görevlerini yerine getirirken takip ettikleri yöntemleri ortaya konulup, karşı çıkan insanların böyle bir tutum ve reaksiyon sergilemelerinin altında yatan ana etkenlerin neler olduğu, ortaya konulmaya çalışılacaktır.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.425
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0740.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversal Journal of TheologySame topicFamilies in Therapy and CultureFrench-language works237,207