MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4313400188 · doi:10.1016/j.apsoil.2022.104778

Adverse impacts of Roundup on soil bacteria, soil chemistry and mycorrhizal fungi during restoration of a Colorado grassland

2022· article· en· W4313400188 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Soil Ecology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicMycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGlyphosateEcosystemAgronomyGrasslandSoil healthSoil waterBiologyBiodiversityNative plantArbuscular mycorrhizal fungiEnvironmental scienceEcologySoil organic matterIntroduced speciesHorticulture

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Glyphosate is a widely used herbicide in agricultural, domestic, and restoration settings to manage weeds and invasive plants and is the active ingredient in the herbicide formulation Roundup. Concurrently with its drastic increase in usage, concern over indirect ecosystem effects and effects on non-target species has grown. In restoration, glyphosate is often used to remove invasive plants so native plants may be re-introduced. However, successful reintroductions require soils and microbial communities that support native plant growth, and it is critical that glyphosate applications do not harm soil microbes such as mycorrhizal fungi. Despite previous studies investigating the effects of glyphosate on soils and microbial communities, comprehensive field experiments combining soil chemistry and next generation sequencing technologies to describe both bacterial and eukaryotic responses to glyphosate are limited, especially in the contexts of ecosystem restoration and soil health. We studied the effects of the glyphosate-based herbicide Roundup Promax at frequencies of 0, 2, 4, and 5 applications over the course of 12 months on soil biotic and abiotic soil health indicators in a Colorado prairie dominated by the invasive cool-season grass Bromus inermis. Here we report cascading effects on soil chemistry, with increases in nitrate and acidity and consequent decreases in calcium content and cation exchange capacity. Bacterial and archaeal communities were more affected by Roundup Promax than eukaryotic communities, with decreases in phylogenetic diversity and changes in community structure following Roundup Promax applications, particularly after five applications. More critically, the colonization of plant roots by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi decreased significantly in plots receiving even just two applications of Roundup Promax, and dark septate endophytes decreased after four applications. Our work shows that Roundup Promax had multiple negative effects on soil biota in this field study due to either direct effects or indirect effects mediated through plant removal. Our results suggest that repeated herbicide applications are especially damaging to soil health and microbe-plant associations. These effects in turn could severely hamper the ability of native plants to establish during ecosystem restoration projects.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.665
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.183
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it