MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4313403799 · doi:10.52825/ocp.v2i.164

Covid-Related Digital Study Stress in the Summer Semester 2021

2022· article· en· W4313403799 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jana Dittmar, Gabriele Helga Franke, Melanie Jagla-Franke

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Conference Proceedings · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicCOVID-19 and Mental Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPandemicCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Stress (linguistics)GermanPsychologyQuarter (Canadian coin)2019-20 coronavirus outbreakStress managementMedicineClinical psychologyGeographyVirologyInternal medicineDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The conversion of classroom teaching to e-learning due to the COVID-19 pandemic is leading to increased stress among students worldwide. In spring 2021, 729 students from six German universities took part in the online study on the stress-related consequences of the COVID 19 pandemic. More than half of the participants exhibited significant chronic stress, almost a quarter were very stressed. Students with higher TICS scores also showed higher levels of stress in the digital study. Thus, students with higher TICS scores also showed increased levels of Digital Study Stress. Social distancing in particular led to increased stress among students during the changeover to e-learning, with Bafög recipients and women being most affected. Both social support and the structure of the study programs were shown to be a resource for reducing stress during the pandemic.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0000.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.125
GPT teacher head0.427
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen Conference ProceedingsSame topicCOVID-19 and Mental HealthFrench-language works237,207