Penilaian Sistem Irigasi Berdasarkan Konsep Pembangunan Berkelanjutan di Kabupaten Pati, Jawa Tengah
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ENGLISHAppraisal of sustainable irrigation systems is based on the concept of sustainable development with 3 criteria namely social, economic, environmental. The balance of these 3 criteria will create sustainable conditions. According to the Regulation of the Minister of Public Works and Public Housing Number 12 of 2015, the performance of the irrigation system includes 6 aspects: physical infrastructure, planting productivity, supporting facilities, personnel organization, documentation and institutional conditions of Associations of Water User Farmers (P3A). This research combines the concept of sustainability and management of irrigation systems. This research is a quantitative descriptive study using Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), in 6 Irrigation Areas (DI), namely DI Gabus, Cabean, Sonorejo, Keden Bendo and Lenggi. The selection of these 6 DI’s was based on the distribution of DI locations in Pati Regency. The purpose of this study is to 1) determining indicators and weights of the irrigation system; and 2) determining the sustainability status of the irrigation system in Pati Regency. The results showed that 1) the highest sub-criteria is the condition of irrigation networks (23.50%), and the lowest sub-criteria is farming ability (2.60%); and 2) the result of the 6 DI, only DI Gabus was in a sustainable condition. INDONESIAPenilaian sistem irigasi berkelanjutan didasarkan pada konsep pembangunan berkelanjutan dengan 3 kriteria yaitu sosial, ekonomi dan lingkungan. Keseimbangan 3 kriteria tersebut akan menciptakan kondisi berkelanjutan (sustainable). Menurut Peraturan Menteri Pekerjaan Umum dan Perumahan Rakyat Nomor 12 Tahun 2015, kinerja sistem irigasi meliputi 6 aspek yaitu prasarana fisik, produktivitas tanam, sarana penunjang, organisasi personalia, dokumentasi dan kondisi kelembagaan Perkumpulan Petani Pemakai Air (P3A). Penelitian ini menggabungkan konsep berkelanjutan dan pengelolaan sistem irigasi. Penelitian merupakan penelitian deskriptif kuantitatif menggunakan Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), dengan jumlah responden 54 orang yang tersebar merata pada 6 Daerah Irigasi (DI) yaitu DI Gabus, Cabean, Sonorejo, Keden, Bendo dan Lenggi. Pemilihan 6 DI dari 13 DI kewenangan Kabupaten Pati, didasarkan pada pertimbangan pemerataan lokasi DI di Kabupaten Pati. Tujuan dari penelitian ini untuk 1) menentukan indikator dan bobot sistem irigasi; dan 2) menentukan status keberlanjutan DI Kabupaten Pati. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa 1) bobot sub-kriteria tertinggi adalah kondisi jaringan irigasi (23,50%), dan terendah sub-kriteria kemampuan usahatani (2,60%); dan 2) hasil penilaian keberlanjutan 6 DI menyatakan bahwa hanya DI Gabus yang berada pada kondisi sustainable.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it