Is NADPH Critical to Maintain Redox Homeostasis in Hypoxia-Tolerant Naked Mole-Rat Brain?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) is a ubiquitous electron donor and a key reducing agent in numerous biochemical reactions. Among other important cellular roles, NADPH activity is central to the maintenance of redox homeostasis in eukaryotic cells. NADPH increases markedly during acute in vivo hypoxia in the brain of naked mole-rats, which are among the most hypoxia-tolerant mammals, and which do not exhibit imbalances in redox homeostasis or increased reactive oxygen species (ROS)-mediated damage during bouts of hypoxia-reoxygenation in brain. Conversely, NADPH does not increase in the brain of hypoxia-intolerant mice, which are prone to deleterious ROS bursts during perturbations in oxygen availability. Although the importance of NADPH in mediating ROS homeostasis has been demonstrated in the brain of other mammals, little is known about the source of NADPH changes in hypoxic naked mole-rat brain, nor about the mechanisms via which NADPH may provide neuroprotection in this species. Elucidating the underlying mechanisms that support the remarkably stable ROS profile in naked mole-rat brain may provide insight into novel mechanisms to ameliorate the deleterious impact of ROS bursts in the brains of hypoxia-intolerant mammals, such as occur during stroke and other diseases. In this review, we discuss what is known regarding the management of ROS and NADPH in naked mole-rat brain, examine potential cellular sources of NADPH that may underlie the large hypoxic increase in this molecule during acute hypoxic exposure, and propose experiments to advance our understanding of the role NADPH has in maintaining naked mole-rat brain redox balance. (First online: December 28, 2022)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".