MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Investigation Using MLP-SVM-PCA Classifiers on Speech Emotion Recognition

2022· article· en· W4313417766 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kabir Jain, Anjali Chaturvedi, Jahnvi Dua, Ramesh K. Bhukya

Bibliographic record

Venue2022 IEEE 9th Uttar Pradesh Section International Conference on Electrical, Electronics and Computer Engineering (UPCON) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicEmotion and Mood Recognition
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpeech recognitionComputer scienceSpectrogramSupport vector machineMel-frequency cepstrumFeature extractionEmotion classificationArtificial intelligenceClassifier (UML)PerceptronMultilayer perceptronHuman voicePattern recognition (psychology)Artificial neural network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sound localization by human listeners are capable of identifying a particular speaker, by listening to the voice of the speaker over the telephone or an entrance-way out of sight. Machines are incapable of understanding and expressing emotions. Emotions play a important role in today's digital world of remote communication. Emotion recognition can be defined as an act of predicting human's emotion through their voice samples and get the accuracy of prediction thus creating a better Human-Computer Interaction (HCI). There are various states to predict human's emotion based on behaviour, expression, pitch, tone, etc. Few of the emotions are considered to recognize the emotions of a speaker behind the speech. This research was conducted to test an speech emotion recognition (SER) system based on voice samples in two-stage approach, namely feature extraction and classification engine. The first one, the key features used for classification of emotions such as extraction of Mel Frequency Cepstral Coefficients (MFCCs), Mel Spectrogram along with Chroma features. Secondly, we use the Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) classifier, elementary classifying Support Vector Machines (SVM) and dimensionality reductionPrincipal Component Analysis (PCA) as classification methods. The research work is considered on the Toronto Emotional Speech Set (TESS) dataset. The proposed approaches gives us 94.17%, 93.43% and 97.86% classification accuracy respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.900
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2022 IEEE 9th Uttar Pradesh Section International Conference on Electrical, Electronics and Computer Engineering (UPCON)Same topicEmotion and Mood RecognitionFrench-language works237,207