Study of gain, noise, and collection efficiency of GaAs SAM-APDs single pixel
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract III-V-compound semiconductors offer many advantages over silicon-based technologies traditionally used in solid-state photodetectors, especially in hard X-ray applications that require high detection efficiency and short response times. Amongst them, gallium arsenide (GaAs) has very promising characteristics in terms of X-ray absorption and high carrier velocity. Furthermore, implementing charge-multiplication mechanisms within the sensor may become of critical importance in cases where the photogenerated signal needs an intrinsic amplification before being acquired by the front-end electronics. This work reports on the experimental characterization by means of lasers and synchrotron radiation of gain, noise, and charge collection efficiencies of GaAs avalanche photodiodes (APDs), realized by molecular beam epitaxy (MBE), featuring separate absorption and multiplication regions (SAM) and different absorption region thicknesses. These devices have been fabricated to investigate the role of the thickness of the absorption region and of possible traps or defects at the metal-semiconductor interfaces in the collection efficiency in order to lay the groundwork for the future development of thicker GaAs devices for detection of hard X-rays.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".