Preeclampsia While on Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic presented many challenges during pregnancy. Complications of COVID-19 in pregnancy were abundant, with higher rates of respiratory failure and preeclampsia. We present here a case of a woman at 24 weeks' gestation requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) for refractory hypoxic respiratory failure and her management for presumed preeclampsia. Current methods to diagnose preeclampsia can be severely impacted by comorbid COVID-19 infection as well as the treatment with ECMO support. This is the first report detailing the challenges of using standard diagnostic criteria for diagnosis of preeclampsia while on ECMO and highlights the potential for and need for further research to identify and guide management of possible preeclampsia/eclampsia. J Clin Gynecol Obstet. 2022;11(4):117-120 doi: https://doi.org/10.14740/jcgo829
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".