Increased functional activity, bottom-up and intrinsic effective connectivity in autism
Bibliographic record
Abstract
• Autism spectrum group shows increased BOLD activity compared to neurotypicals during a sensory learning task . • Groups show no differences in BOLD activity for Prior and Likelihood conditions in the sensory learning task. • Effective hyperconnectivity in bottom-up and intrinsic connections underlies increased functional activity during sensory learning in the autism spectrum group. Sensory perceptual alterations such as sensory sensitivities in autism have been proposed to be caused by differences in sensory observation (Likelihood) or in forming models of the environment (Prior), which result in an increase in bottom-up information flow relative to top-down control. To investigate this conjecture, we had autistic individuals (AS) and neurotypicals (NT) perform a decision-under-uncertainty paradigm while undergoing functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). There were no group differences in task performance and in Prior and Likelihood representations in brain activity. However, there were significant group differences in overall task activity, with the AS group showing significantly greater activation in the bilateral precuneus, mid-occipital gyrus, cuneus, superior frontal gyrus (SFG) and left putamen relative to the NT group. Further, when pooling the data across both groups, we found that those with higher AQ scores showed greater activity in the left cuneus and precuneus. Effective connectivity analysis using dynamic causal modelling (DCM) revealed that group differences in BOLD signals were underpinned by increased activity within sensory regions and a net increase in bottom-up connectivity from the occipital region to the precuneus and the left SFG. These findings support the hypothesis of increased bottom-up information flow in autism during sensory learning tasks.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".