MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4313425474 · doi:10.55476/001c.66252

The Papal Apologies to Indigenous Peoples in Canada - Introduction

2023· article· en· W4313425474 on OpenAlex
Doris M. Kieser

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Moral Theology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMulticultural Socio-Legal Studies
Canadian institutionsThe King's UniversityUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArchbishopIndigenousPolitical scienceMedia studiesSociologyHistoryClassics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

At the Canadian Theological Society conference in May 2022, a roundtable convened to discuss Pope Francis’ apology to Indigenous Peoples in Canada, offered in April 2022 in Rome. Each of the respondents, Archbishop Don Bolen (Regina, Saskatchewan), Dr. Christian Jamieson (Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec), Dr. Jeremy Bergen (Conrad Grebel University College, Waterloo, Ontario), and Rev. Daryold Winkler (Ottawa, Ontario), contributed insights and reflections from their own experiential and scholarly perspectives. Their contributions comprise the discussions that follow. Some of the respondents include reflections on the subsequent Papal visit to Canada in July 2022.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.197
Threshold uncertainty score0.414

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it