MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4313425493 · doi:10.55476/001c.66236

Pope Francis’ Apology: Encounter and Meaning

2023· article· en· W4313425493 on OpenAlex
Christine Jamieson

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Moral Theology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMulticultural Socio-Legal Studies
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMeaning (existential)IndigenousSociologyLawMedia studiesHistoryPolitical sciencePsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

On April 1, 2022, Pope Francis apologized to First Nations, Métis, and Inuit delegates (Elders, knowledge keepers, residential school survivors, and youth) who travelled from Canada to Rome to meet with the Pope. The article explores the meaning and impact of the encounter between the Indigenous delegates and the Pope. It also considers the deep impression the Pope’s apology made not only on those delegates present in Rome but also on so many others back in Canada whom the delegates represented. Why did the encounter and the apology have such a profound impact on the delegates present in Rome and on so many of their fellow survivors of residential schools? Along with exploring this question, the article considers the importance of encounters taking place in both “lodges” – both in Rome and in Canada. It also briefly explores how the encounters and meetings were guided by an ethical stance that made the meetings possible.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.202
Threshold uncertainty score0.292

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it