DANS LES ARCHIVES DE MARCEL MAUSS AVEC MARCEL FOURNIER
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Marcel Fournier, born in Quebec in 1945, completed his sociology studies at the University of Montréal and defended his master’s thesis under the supervision of Marcel Rioux at the same university. He came to France to pursue his doctoral study at the École pratique des hautes études under the supervision of Bourdieu. From 1974, when he defended his thesis, he began working at the University of Montréal, where he would spend his entire academic career, in the Department of Sociology. Fournier, who has many publications on sociology of culture, sociology of science and sociological theory, is accepted as the main reference in the field today, especially with his research on the history of French sociology and the Durkheim school. His book Marcel Mauss, published in 1994, is a prosopography that tells the history of both Mauss individually and the Durkheim school. After this biography, Fournier prepared Écrits politiques (1997), a compilation of Mauss’ political writings published in different journals. Lettres à Marcel Mauss, which they edited with Philippe Besnard in 1998, consists of the correspondence between Durkheim and Mauss. Fournier, in collaboration with Jean Terrier, helped to publish Mauss’ unfinished work La nation, ou le sens du social and published Émile Durkheim (1858-1917), the first biography of Durkheim written in French in 2007. Today, it is almost impossible to work in the field of French sociological history without referring to these works, which Fournier personally wrote or edited for publication. This interview, which is the outcome of two meetings held in Paris on 15 and 26 October 2022, proceeds along the line of Durkheim-Mauss-Lévi-Strauss-Bourdieu and, touches on from the story of Mauss’ archive to his personality, political engagement, working method and, of course, his relationship with Durkheim.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.026 | 0.011 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".