Federated Learning via Augmented Knowledge Distillation for Heterogenous Deep Human Activity Recognition Systems
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Deep learning-based Human Activity Recognition (HAR) systems received a lot of interest for health monitoring and activity tracking on wearable devices. The availability of large and representative datasets is often a requirement for training accurate deep learning models. To keep private data on users' devices while utilizing them to train deep learning models on huge datasets, Federated Learning (FL) was introduced as an inherently private distributed training paradigm. However, standard FL (FedAvg) lacks the capability to train heterogeneous model architectures. In this paper, we propose Federated Learning via Augmented Knowledge Distillation (FedAKD) for distributed training of heterogeneous models. FedAKD is evaluated on two HAR datasets: A waist-mounted tabular HAR dataset and a wrist-mounted time-series HAR dataset. FedAKD is more flexible than standard federated learning (FedAvg) as it enables collaborative heterogeneous deep learning models with various learning capacities. In the considered FL experiments, the communication overhead under FedAKD is 200X less compared with FL methods that communicate models' gradients/weights. Relative to other model-agnostic FL methods, results show that FedAKD boosts performance gains of clients by up to 20 percent. Furthermore, FedAKD is shown to be relatively more robust under statistical heterogeneous scenarios.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it