Dimensões didáticas e disciplinares do Ensino da História: o caso do 6º ano do ensino fundamental no Brasil e do 3e cycle du primaire no Quebec
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este artigo parte de um exercício comparativo sobre o 6º ano do ensino fundamental no Brasil (alunos de 11 anos, em média) e o 3º ciclo do ensino fundamental no Quebec (alunos de 11 a 12 anos). Um historiador e um pedagogo fazem uma análise comparativa dos programas curriculares dessas duas realidades. A partir dessa estratégia hermenêutica, colocam-se em discussão os conteúdos disciplinares específicos relacionados ao 6º ano no Brasil, juntamente àqueles do 3º ciclo primário no Quebec. Considerando as tensões disciplinares entre a Educação e a História, este artigo visa examinar a aprendizagem da História nas escolas, principalmente no que tange à construção curricular, ao desenvolvimento de competências e, em particular, do pensamento histórico.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".