MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4313451021 · doi:10.1002/adom.202202475

An Organic–Inorganic Tin Halide Perovskite with Over 2000‐Hour Emission Stability

2022· article· en· W4313451021 on OpenAlexaff
Qian Chen, Mingming Zhang, Fangxu Dai, Lili Zhao, Shuyang Liu, Huimin Zhao, Hong Zhou, Lihua Teng, Weigao Xu, Jun Xing

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvanced Optical Materials · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPerovskite Materials and Applications
Canadian institutionsMinistry of Education and Child Care
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsHalideTinPhotoluminescenceMaterials sciencePerovskite (structure)Quantum yieldExcitonPhotochemistryNanotechnologyOptoelectronicsChemical engineeringInorganic chemistryFluorescenceChemistryOpticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Organic–inorganic tin (Sn)‐based halide perovskites have attracted special attention due to their outstanding photophysical properties and eco‐friendly nature. However, the instability of Sn‐based perovskites is still a pressing issue that needs to be addressed. Here, a new lead‐free hybrid Sn(IV) bromide hybrid (4‐APEA)2SnBr6 (4‐APEA: 2‐(4‐aminophenyl)ethylammonium) is synthesized with remarkable stability. This compound has strong electron–phonon coupling, resulting in excitons self‐trapping and broadband yellow emission with a photoluminescence peak at 566 nm. The bare (4‐APEA)2SnBr6 shows impressive emission stability in the air; maintains 90% of photoluminescence quantum yield under ultraviolet light irradiation over 2000 h (T90 > 2000 h), representing the most stable halide hybrids. The excellent stability is profit from the stable valence state and few defect state densities. The findings show the promising prospect of environment‐friendly organic–inorganic halide perovskites and their usage in optoelectronic applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvanced Optical MaterialsSame topicPerovskite Materials and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207