S-PDB: Analysis and Classification of SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Structures
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper proposes a novel and efficient method, called S-PDB, for the analysis and classification of Spike (S) protein structures of SARS-CoV-2 and other viruses/organisms in the Protein Data Bank (PDB). The method first finds and identifies protein structures in PDB that are similar to a protein structure of interest (SARS-CoV-2 S) via a protein structure comparison tool. The amino acid (AA) sequences of identified protein structures, downloaded from PDB, and their aligned amino acids (AAA) and secondary structure elements (ASSE), that are stored in three separate datasets, are then used for the reliable detection/classification of SARS-CoV-2 S protein structures. Three classifiers are used and their performance is compared by using six evaluation metrics. Obtained results show that two classifiers for text data (Multinomial Naive Bayes and Stochastic Gradient Descent) performed better and achieved high accuracy on the dataset that contains AAA of protein structures compared to the datasets for AA and ASSE, respectively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it