Potensi Alfa Enolase (ENO1) Membran Plasma Spermatozoa Sapi Bali Sebagai protein Antigenik
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Antibodi imunoglobulin G (IgG) merupakan salah satu immunoglobulin yang dikandung oleh antibodi anti-sperma (ASA) yang terdapat pada saluran reproduksi betina. Imunoglobulin G dapt berikatan dengan protein-protein yang berpotensi sebagai protein antigenik seperti alfa enolase (ENO1). Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasi dinamika dan potensi ENO1 membran plasma spermatozoa sebagai protein antigenik serta kualitas spermatozoa sapi Bali dengan perlakuan 0,5 mg/ml IgG. Sampel penelitian adalah 16 ejakulat yang diperoleh dari 4 ekor pejantan. Motilitas spermatozoa dievaluasi menggunakan CASA, viabilitas melalui metode pewarnaan diferensial, Keutuhan Membran Plasma (MPU) menggunakan metode Hypo-osmotic Swelling Test (HOS-Test), nilai Mix Anti-globulin Reaction (MAR) diperoleh dari MAR-Test, sedangkan kuantitas ENO1 diukur dengan ELISA. Analisis data menggunakan analisis ragam RAK. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa perlakuan dengan IgG sampai 0,5 mg/ml menurunkan motilitas, kinematika spermatozoa, viabilitas, MPU dan kuantitas ENO1 membran plasma spermatozoa (P<0,01), serta meningkatkan nilai MAR-test (P<0,05). Penelitian menyimpulkan bahwa IgG dapat menurunkan kualitas spermatozoa dan kuantitas ENO1, sekaligus menunjukkan bahwa ENO1 membran plasma spermatozoa sapi Bali berpotensi sebagai protein antigenik.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".