MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

1101 Urine complement activation products in lupus nephritis

2022· article· en· W4313460612 on OpenAlexaff
Nicholas Li, Daniel J. Birmingham, Laura Biederman, Tibor Nádasdy, Brad H. Rovin

Bibliographic record

VenueInnate Immunity · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSystemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLupus nephritisMedicineProteinuriaComplement systemUrineRenal biopsyCreatinineInternal medicineKidneyGastroenterologyPathologyBiopsyImmunologyAntibodyDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Complement activation plays a critical role in the development of kidney injury during lupus nephritis (LN). Clinical trials targeting the complement pathway are now underway in LN. It is therefore important to understand the relationship between intra-renal complement activation and kidney histology in LN, and whether complement activation products (CAPs) can serve as biomarkers to guide complement-directed therapies. In this investigation, urine CAPs levels were measured, and associations with kidney injury were determined. Methods A cohort of 149 patients had urine and blood collected at the time of kidney biopsy for suspected LN. The CAPs C5a, C5b-9, and factor Ba were measured in the urine by ELISA. Biopsies were examined by routine histology, and the NIH activity and chronicity indexes (AI,CI) were calculated by two nephropathologists. CAPs levels were correlated with clinical and histologic data using the spearman correlation r. Results The results are summarized in the table 1. The highest levels of CAPs were found in patients with proliferative or proliferative plus membranous LN, with lower levels in pure class II and V. All three urine CAPs correlated with AI, but the strongest correlation was between C5b-9 and AI. Only Ba and C5a correlated with CI, but this correlation was, at best, modest. All CAPs correlated with proteinuria, while only Ba and C5a correlated with serum creatinine. Conclusion Urine C5b-9 was the best measure of histologic activity in LN. Given the size of the C5b-9 complex, it is unlikely to be filtered, even by glomeruli with a damaged glomerular permeability barrier. Urine C5b-9 therefore only reflects intra-renal complement activity. C5a and Ba associated modestly with active lesions, as well as kidney damage, likely accounting for their association with serum creatinine. We suggest levels of urine C5b-9 could be used to follow the success of anti-complement therapies in mitigating intra- renal complement activation in LN.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInnate ImmunitySame topicSystemic Lupus Erythematosus ResearchFrench-language works237,207