MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4313460794 · doi:10.26450/jshsr.3380

KAYBOLMAYA YÜZ TUTMUŞ KÜLTÜREL BİR DEĞER: ULUS (BARTIN) İLÇESİNDE TARİHİ SU DEĞİRMENLERİ

2022· article· tr· W4313460794 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Şaban Çelikoğlu

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Social Humanities Sciences Research (JSHSR) · 2022
Typearticle
Languagetr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicCultural and Sociopolitical Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)MillGeographyArchaeologyHistoryEconomyAncient historyEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this study, the historical water mills, which are among our cultural values that begin to disappear with the developing technology, have been addressed specifically to the district of Ulus (Bartın Province). The traditional water mills have fulfilled a very significant mission for many years. Mills are the venues where the crops, which are transported to the warehouses after the blending process is completed, are grounded, crushed, or turned into flour so that they can be offered for consumption. The water mills, which are the output of a rich accumulation from the place of establishment, to the architectural style, from the working order to the production process, have come to preserve their functionality until quite recently and have been the subject of folk songs, idioms, and proverbs as a part of cultural and economic life. While the Ulus district of Bartın province was a place that had a functioning water mill in almost every village and a place that had a river or stream passing near or around it almost a quarter of a century ago, some of these mills, in this day and age, have been destroyed and some of them are left to be demolished. Nevertheless, there still exists a few mills that have survived to this day and are up and running. While these mills continue their traditional functions to meet the needs of the local people, they have also begun to undertake a function to meet the increasing demand for healthy and natural diet.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.063

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.299
GPT teacher head0.425
Teacher spread0.126 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Social Humanities Sciences Research (JSHSR)Same topicCultural and Sociopolitical StudiesFrench-language works237,207