MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4313464425 · doi:10.36419/jki.v13i1.564

HUBUNGAN OBESITAS, POLA MAKAN DAN CAKUPAN KUNJUNGAN ANTENATAL CARE DENGAN KEJADIAN PREEKLAMPSIA PADA IBU HAMIL TRIMESTER III

2022· article· id· W4313464425 on OpenAlexaff
Destri Wulandari, Merisa Riski, Putu Lusita Nati Indriani

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal Kebidanan Indonesia · 2022
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldMedicine
TopicPublic Health and Nutrition
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineGynecology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRAK Latar Belakang : Preeklampsia ialah penyakit dengan tanda meningkatnya tekanan darah >140/90mmHg disertai proteinuria serta edema yang muncul di usia kandungan >20/hingga 48 jam postpartum.Tujuan : Tujuan penelitian untuk melihat kaitan obesitas, pola makan, dan cakupan kunjungan ANC dan preeklampsia pada ibu hamil trimester III.Penelitian ini dilakukan di Wilayah Kerja Puskesmas Keramasan Palembang Agustus tahun 2021.Metode : Adapun metode survey analitik dengan pendekatan Cross Sectional dipilih dalam peneltian ini.Sampel ada 32 responden yang diambil secara Accidental Sampling.Dalam penelitian ini teknik yang dipakai oleh peneliti berupa teknik pengumpulan data primer.Analisis data univariate menggunakan distribusi frekuensi, sedangkan analisis bivariate menggunakan Chi Square dengan Stastitical Product Servise Solution (SPSS) versi 26.Hasil : Hasilnya ditemukan hubungan yang signifikan dari obesitas (PValue = 0,003) pola makan (PValue = 0,009) dan preekalmsia.Dan, tidak terdapat kaitan yang signifikan dari cakupan kunjungan ANC dengan preeklampsia PValue = 1,000.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.051

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJurnal Kebidanan IndonesiaSame topicPublic Health and NutritionFrench-language works237,207