MC-UNet: Martian Crater Segmentation at Semantic and Instance Levels Using U-Net-Based Convolutional Neural Network
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Crater recognition on Mars is of paramount importance for many space science applications, such as accurate planetary surface age dating and geological mapping. Such recognition is achieved by means of various image-processing techniques employing traditional CNNs (convolutional neural networks), which typically suffer from slow convergence and relatively low accuracy. In this paper, we propose a novel CNN, referred to as MC-UNet (Martian Crater U-Net), wherein classical U-Net is employed as the backbone for accurate identification of Martian craters at semantic and instance levels from thermal-emission-imaging-system (THEMIS) daytime infrared images. Compared with classical U-Net, the depth of the layers of MC-UNet is expanded to six, while the maximum number of channels is decreased to one-fourth, thereby making the proposed CNN-based architecture computationally efficient while maintaining a high recognition rate of impact craters on Mars. For enhancing the operation of MC-UNet, we adopt average pooling and embed channel attention into the skip-connection process between the encoder and decoder layers at the same network depth so that large-sized Martian craters can be more accurately recognized. The proposed MC-UNet is adequately trained using 2∼32 km radii Martian craters from THEMIS daytime infrared annotated images. For the predicted Martian crater rim pixels, template matching is subsequently used to recognize Martian craters at the instance level. The experimental results indicate that MC-UNet has the potential to recognize Martian craters with a maximum radius of 31.28 km (136 pixels) with a recall of 0.7916 and F1-score of 0.8355. The promising performance shows that the proposed MC-UNet is on par with or even better than other classical CNN architectures, such as U-Net and Crater U-Net.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".