Publications in the Field of Theatre: Bibliometric Analysis of International Theatre Studies
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to examine international publications in the field of theatre using bibliometric analysis methods. For this purpose, scientific articles published in the journals listed in Web of Science are analysed. A total of 8,047 articles published from 1975 to 2021are included in the analysis. Descriptive bibliometric analysis and social network mapping method are used to examine data. According to the analysis, the first three countries that have contributed the most to the field of theatre are the USA, England and Canada. In terms of citations, the most cited articles in the field are also published in the most cited journals in the field. Moreover, the most frequently cited books in the field are related to publications that improve the intellectual structure of the field. In terms of co-author citation analysis, our study shows that the most frequently cited authors are Shakespeare, Brecht, Boal, Schechner and Beckett.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.042 | 0.026 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it