MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4313475492 · doi:10.3389/fnut.2022.1080156

Dietary adherence to the Mediterranean diet pattern in a randomized clinical trial of patients with quiescent ulcerative colitis

2022· article· en· W4313475492 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Natasha Haskey, Rachel C. K. Shim, Alexander Davidson-Hunt, Jiayu Ye, Sunny Singh, Levinus A. Dieleman, Kevan Jacobson, Sanjoy Ghosh, Deanna L. Gibson

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Nutrition · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of British ColumbiaPublic Health OntarioBC Children's HospitalUniversity of TorontoOkanagan University CollegeUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus
FundersCrohn's and Colitis CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchCanadian Foundation for Dietetic ResearchCanadian Association of Gastroenterology
KeywordsUlcerative colitisRandomized controlled trialMedicineMediterranean dietInternal medicineDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background The Mediterranean diet pattern (MDP) is believed to improve health and promote balanced inflammation and metabolism. While unknown, compelling evidence suggests that MDP could benefit patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We aimed to evaluate the level of diet adherence, diet quality, and nutritional adequacy of the MDP in patients with Ulcerative Colitis (UC). Methods Adult participants ( n = 32) with quiescent UC were randomized to follow a MDP ( n = 18) or Canadian Habitual Diet (CHD) ( n = 14) for 12 weeks. The MDP participants received tailored nutrition education from a Registered Dietitian. Demographic, clinical data, medical history, and quality of life were assessed with the Short Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (SIBDQ), dietary adherence with the Mediterranean Diet Serving Score (MDSS), diet quality via the Healthy Eating Index-2015 (HEI-2015), and dietary intake (ASA-24) were completed at baseline and week 12. Results Participants’ diets were analyzed (MDP n = 15, CHD n = 13). The MDP ( n = 10, 67%) achieved a high level of adherence (MDSS score between 16 and 24) vs. CHD ( n = 3), ( p = 0.030). HEI-2015 significantly increased from baseline to week 12 ( p = 0.007) in the MDP and was significantly higher at week 12 compared to the CHD ( p = 0.0001). The SIBDQ (bowel domain) showed reductions in the passage of large amounts of gas ( p = 0.01) and improvements in tenesmus ( p = 0.03) in the MDP. Despite enhanced diet quality and adherence in the MDP, females had inadequate intakes of calcium, iron, vitamin D, vitamin E, and choline and males had inadequate intakes of fiber, vitamin D, vitamin E, and choline. No adverse events were reported. Conclusion With nutrition education, high adherence to the MDP was achieved without an increase in bowel symptoms. Following the MDP led to a higher diet quality; however, nutritional inadequacies were identified. Tailored dietary education focusing on nutrients of concern when following the MDP is recommended to ensure nutritional adequacy. Clinical trial registration [ www.ClinicalTrials.gov ], identifier [NCT03053713].

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.126
Threshold uncertainty score0.334

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2022
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in NutritionSame topicInflammatory Bowel DiseaseFrench-language works237,207