Crecimiento impulsado por los salarios: concepto, teorías y políticas
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El artículo se propone reconsiderar las teorías y las políticas que han imperado en la economía mundial durante las últimas décadas y se han implementado sin que se les cuestione, a pesar de sucesos como la crisis financiera global de 2007, que han demostrado la ineficiencia y la inestabilidad de los mercados financieros no regulados. Hace un estudio comparativo respecto de políticas públicas en favor del capital y aquellas favorables al trabajo, así como entre regímenes económicos impulsados por las ganancias o por los salarios, por la deuda o por las exportaciones, y analiza cómo la combinación de estos factores puede afectar una economía. De esta manera demuestra que el neoliberalismo ya no es viable para el crecimiento y reflexiona acerca de la necesidad de un cambio de paradigma.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.056 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".