Model-Based Data Augmentation Applied to Deep Learning Networks for Classification of Micro-Doppler Signatures Using FMCW Radar
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Deep neural networks (DNNs) have become a relevant subject in the classification of radio frequency signals and remote sensing data. A primary challenge is a tradeoff between obtaining data that are suitable for DNN training and the effort that making experimental measurements requires. Hence, the quality and quantity of data used for the training and testing of models are crucial for effective classifier development. The training dataset should cover a wide range of cases that synthesize the actual scenarios being classified. This work proposes a novel data augmentation method based on a deterministic model to generate a simulated dataset of radar micro-Doppler signatures suitable for unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) target classification, without requiring measurement data. It is shown that the DNN trained using the properly generated model-based data offers improved classification accuracy performance. Results are presented for a two-class classification of the number of UAV motors using a 77-GHz frequency-modulated continuous-wave (FMCW) automotive radar system. The effectiveness of the proposed methodology is proven: a classification accuracy of 78.68% is achieved using a convolutional neural network (CNN) trained using the synthetic dataset, while an accuracy of 66.18% is achieved by using a typical signal processing data augmentation method on a limited measured dataset.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".