Awaruite, a new large nickel resource: Activation by ammonium sulfate and thiosulfate for flotation
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Awaruite is a native nickel-iron alloy with high nickel content and mainly present in serpentinized ultramafic rocks. Recent discoveries have demonstrated the potential for awaruite to contribute to the economics of a nickel deposit. Awaruite selectively floats in weakly acidic conditions with xanthate as collector. However high reagent dosages are required in such conditions since xanthate decomposes and ultramafic rocks are acid consumers. In this work, a novel reagent scheme including ammonium sulfate and sodium thiosulfate is proposed to float awaruite in neutral conditions from ultramafic rocks. Electrochemical studies were carried out on awaruite samples to demonstrate the effect of low concentrations of these reagents on the awaruite surface. The awaruite passivation layer formed in alkaline conditions (natural slurry pH) can, at least, be partially dissolved in the presence of low concentrations of ammonium sulfate and thiosulfate in neutral conditions. After the passivation layer is partially removed, the xanthate collector reacts with the awaruite surface and induces hydrophobicity, thus enabling the awaruite flotation. Microflotation and bench scale flotation tests demonstrate the applicability of the reagent scheme herein proposed. This reagent scheme allows the flotation of awaruite in conditions where xanthate is stable and reduces the acid addition required to adjust the pH.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it