MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4313485456 · doi:10.1093/gji/ggac503

Integration of a Gaussian quadrature grid discretization approach with a generalized stiffness reduction method and a parallelized direct solver for 3-D frequency-domain seismic wave modelling in viscoelastic anisotropic media

2022· article· en· W4313485456 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Guoqi Ma, Bing Zhou, Stewart Greenhalgh, Xu Liu, Mohamed Jamal Zemerly, Mohamed Kamel Riahi

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysical Journal International · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSeismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSolverComputer scienceDiscretizationGridComputational scienceGaussian quadratureAlgorithmApplied mathematicsMathematicsGeometryMathematical analysisBoundary value problemNyström method

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

SUMMARY We integrate three advanced numerical techniques—Gaussian quadrature grid (GQG) discretization, a new generalized stiffness reduction method and the latest version of an efficient parallelized direct solver to achieve accurate 3-D frequency-domain seismic wave modelling in viscoelastic anisotropic media. A GQG is employed to sample and interpolate both model parameters and wavefield quantities as well as to fit with arbitrary free-surface topography and subsurface interfaces of a geological model. A new version of the generalized stiffness reduction method is utilized to effectively remove the artificial boundary edge effects for which the common perfectly matched layer method fails. The most recent version of a multifrontal massively parallel direct solver is applied to tackle the notoriously expensive computation of frequency-domain 3-D wave modelling. We validate the 3-D modelling by comparing with the exact solutions for homogeneous viscoelastic isotropic, vertically transversely isotropic and orthorhombic media. All the results show very close matches between the numerical and analytical solutions. Then, we investigate the computational efficiency of the parallelized direct solver, compare its performance using different ordering schemes, in-core and out-of-core factorization modes and the block low-rank approximation in the factorization for different grid sizes. Our modelling results show that the ordering scheme of the so-called ‘Metis’ is the best for reducing computer memory and run time, and the parallelized direct solver is remarkably faster than iterative solvers for similar workloads but at the expense of higher memory requirements. The out-of-core factorization mode can effectively reduce the memory cost without a compromising on run time. The block low-rank approximation is able to significantly reduce the run time in both the factorization and solving process (up to 56 per cent in total), but will increase the memory cost when using the out-of-core factorization mode. Efficient application of this parallel direct solver should use ‘Metis’ as the ordering scheme and select the out-of-core factorization mode without the block low-rank approximation as the best scheme to save the memory cost, or the in-core factorization mode with the block low-rank approximation for the fastest computation. Finally, we demonstrate the excellent applicability of the 3-D wave modelling scheme for a practical and complex heterogeneous geological model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.511
Threshold uncertainty score0.408

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysical Journal InternationalSame topicSeismic Imaging and Inversion TechniquesFrench-language works237,207