MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

An Efficient Distributed Transactive Energy Control Model Using Adaptive Consensus ADMM

2022· article· en· W4313490490 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptimal Power Flow Distribution
Canadian institutionsHydro-QuébecUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransactive memoryComputer scienceConvergence (economics)Mathematical optimizationEconomic shortageOperator (biology)Control (management)Energy (signal processing)ImplementationDistributed computingArtificial intelligenceMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a distributed Transactive Energy Control (TEC) model for energy management purposes in distribution networks. The shortages of centralized and decentralized methods have been addressed in this paper, wherein the system operator plays the role of coordinator to not only oversee the system constraints, but also maintain the system privacy. Prosumers, also, can solve their own energy management problem separately without secure data sharing. To solve the proposed model, the adaptive Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers (ADMM) method is utilized in which the penalty factor is specified based on optimality and feasibility condition in each iteration. The implementations express that the proposed model can improve the accuracy and speed of convergence by 40.36 and 49.99 percent compared to regular ADMM.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.759
Threshold uncertainty score0.905

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOptimal Power Flow DistributionFrench-language works237,207