MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4313491368 · doi:10.2172/1846241

Quality Control of and Analysis Enabling Use of MARCUS and MICRE data for Scientific Applications

2021· report· en· W4313491368 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Greg M. McFarquhar, Roger Marchand, Christopher Bretherton

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicParticle Detector Development and Performance
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersShanghai Typhoon InstituteGoddard Space Flight CenterNanjing UniversityBrookhaven National LaboratoryPeking UniversityChinese Academy of SciencesMcGill UniversityNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationUniversity of OklahomaDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
KeywordsData scienceField (mathematics)Computer scienceQuality (philosophy)Scientific literatureControl (management)Management scienceEngineeringArtificial intelligenceEpistemologyMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The primary objective of this project was to provide a preliminary investigation of data collected during the MARCUS/MICRE field experiments and to produce products and analysis for the scientific community that will enable future scientific investigations and hypothesis testing. Further, the goal was to assist those in the scientific community to understand the strengths and caveats of the MARCUS/MICRE data so that members of the scientific community could use the data in their publications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.608
Threshold uncertainty score0.341

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.147
GPT teacher head0.366
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicParticle Detector Development and PerformanceFrench-language works237,207